Skip to main content

THE STORY OF PI.

The story of Pi Take any circle, measure its circumference and its diameter. The ratio of these two numbers is a mathematical constant we call pi. while this definition is simple pi has been studied for thousands of years and History of our understanding not just of the value of pi. But also, what it means forms a history of all of mathematics it takes us from the Middle East to Europe to China to India and even America. It's a history, which involves revolutions murder and the infinite. Math is as old as civilization older even. There's evidence of counting going back thirty thousand years and two of the very earliest civilizations the ancient Egyptians and Babylonians both investigated pi around 4000 years ago the Babylonians estimated PI to be 3 and 1/8. Remember that the first few digits of pi are 3.1415926. There are more, that means that the Babylonian estimate of Pi is accurate to 1% of its true value. Which is kind of astonishing when you remember that thi...

THE STORY OF PI.

The story of Pi
Take any circle, measure its circumference and its diameter. The ratio of these two numbers is a mathematical constant we call pi. while this definition is simple pi has been studied for thousands of years and History of our understanding not just of the value of pi. But also, what it means forms a history of all of mathematics it takes us from the Middle East to Europe to China to India and even America. It's a history, which involves revolutions murder and the infinite.
Math is as old as civilization older even. There's evidence of counting going back thirty thousand years and two of the very earliest civilizations the ancient Egyptians and Babylonians both investigated pi around 4000 years ago the Babylonians estimated PI to be 3 and 1/8. Remember that the first few digits of pi are 3.1415926. There are more, that means that the Babylonian estimate of Pi is accurate to 1% of its true value. Which is kind of astonishing when you remember that this is a time in human history when iron was first being used and the last mammoths went extinct the ancient Egyptians on the other hand estimated PI slightly less accurately as you have to count it by definition. Measure a curved surface, which is super tricky to do accurately Well one way of doing it is to cheat and actually use a square compare a square and a circle well It’s quite a little bit like a circle But that was not as much like circle as a Pentagon which has one more side than a square and a Pentagon doesn't look quite as much like a circle as a hexagon which has one more side again and a hexagon doesn't look quite as much like a circle as a heptagon and So on. You can think of a circle as a regular polygon just want with an extremely large number of sides So many sides in fact that each individual one is Infinitesimally small meaning that the circle looks round. This was exactly the thinking that legendary ancient Greek mathematician Archimedes used when estimating pi around 220 BC in fact It was probably the very last thing, he ever did to approximate pi. He reasoned why not measure the perimeter of a square adding up the lengths of all of its edges and then dividing that number by the square’s diameter but what is the diameter of a square is it the length of its diagonal or the length of one of its edges? “Why not both”, said Archimedes. Draw one square with its corners just touching the perimeter of a circle. Another square with its faces just touching the perimeter of that same circle add up the lengths of the sides of each square divided by their effective diameters. And you have two estimates for the value of “pi” the true value of which lie somewhere between those two numbers but here's the really clever part because the difference between those two values is pretty big if you're using squares because a square isn't much like a circle but replace those squares with Pentagon's and you shrink the difference between those two numbers. Meaning that there's a smaller range of values that PI could be your estimation just got more accurate And if you replace those Pentagon's with hexagons you'll get an even more accurate estimates keep increasing the number of faces on the shape that you're drawing inside and outside the circle and your estimate will get more and more accurate as long as you have the time and patience to draw said shapes There is a reason why this thing was called the “method of exhaustion” Archimedes got up to a 96 sided shape which incidentally is called an a “enneacontakaihexagon”, giving an estimate of Pi between 3.1408 and 3.1429, so accurate to two decimal places as I mentioned earlier this was likely his final contribution to science because into 212 BC he was killed by Roman soldiers who invaded his hometown Syracuse. He was apparently performing this Calculation at the time allegedly his final words were “Don't disturb my circles”. European progress in the study of “pi” died with Archimedes for well over a thousand years.
Fortunately, however there was plenty of the world which was not in Europe. Mathematicians there were also interested in PI in particular three mathematical superpowers of the first millennium AD, i.e., China India and Persia. Ideas from these three nations were soon to change the world. First off, Chinese mathematicians used a method of exhaustion similar to our Archemedians but instead of considering the parameters of shapes they considered their areas and one Chinese mathematician (Liu-Hui) used a polygon with 3072 sides to obtain Pi to five decimal places. 200 years later, a father and son team used a polygon with 12,288 sides to extend that record to six decimal places and that was a world record which stood for eight hundred years. The problem was it was just difficult to do the calculations. It was just awkward to write down what you were doing to physically do the calculation and this was something that would only be resolved by the introduction of two world changing ideas from India and Persia.
Say that you want to do a calculation, you know that you and your friend together weigh a hundred and twenty-five kilos and you also know that you weigh 70 kilos the question is how much does your friend weigh? Mathematically, we'd write. This as X plus 70 equals 125 kilos. Subtract 70 from both sides and you get the answer. 55 kilos.
 In this example we used two brilliant ideas, revolutionary to the classical world. Firstly, we wrote large numbers like 125 and 70 using a simple notation, we take it for granted these days but the ability to write any number using just ten symbols and a place value notation where the position of a symbol in a number determines its size massively simplifies arithmetic. To see what I mean try and do that calculation only using Roman numerals. Our modern decimal notation was first developed in India some time before 400 AD then rapidly spread to Persia where the second key idea came from, i.e., representing your friend's weight using some symbol X and then manipulating both sides of the equation, this of course is algebra originally developed by Babylonian and ancient Greek mathematicians But truly established by Persian mathematician and all-round very influential Arab mathematician Mohammed eben Musa al-khwarizmi. decimal notation and algebra allowed for much easier calculations across all of maths and mathematicians working on calculating PI used it to turbocharge their work after the Renaissance and a renewed interest in mathematics along with crucially new tools from the east. Europe was back in the game and in 1630 the most accurate estimate of Pi using the polygon method was achieved by Austrian astronomer Christiaan grind Berger who used a shape with 10 to the power 40 sides to calculate Pi to thirty decimal places. The adoption of algebra by European mathematicians triggered a whole new way of looking at the world a change in thinking generally grouped under the title the “Scientific Revolution” Which itself went on to inspire the Age of Enlightenment with thinkers like Rene Descartes and John Locke. Amongst other ideas the Enlightenment movement emphasized the value of Reason over Tradition and new mathematical ideas were held up as Paragons of this. They were pure reason. The change in how 17th century European mathematicians calculated PI is arguably a Perfect example of the shift from following what the ancients did to new rational, theoretical approaches, because while the ancients like Archimedes may have measured the perimeters of shapes increasingly similar to circles. Now European mathematicians were using a method based entirely on reason. A method based on Infinite series. An infinite series is just an expression made up of things added together one after the other after the other after the other and so on until forever. If those contributions keep getting smaller as you go on then the series converges to a particular value. Sometimes you can work out what that value will be using logical arguments? But sometimes you just have to keep calculating term after term after term until you reach an accuracy that you're happy with. The Method of using infinite series to calculate pi was first used not in Europe but again in India. You could kind of argue that what Archimedes did was an infinite series? But the first person to write a mathematical function as an infinite series was Indian mathematician Madhava of Sangamagrama. In the 14th century, he wrote down expressions for the sine cosine and tangent of an angle as well as the inverse tangent. Quick refresher if you write the expression y equals tan of X, the Expansion for the tangent would tell you what y equals if you already know what X is while the expansion of the inverse tangent would tell you what X is if you already know what Y is. By its definition the function tan of X precisely equals 1 when x equals 1/4 pi That means that if you have an expression for the inverse tangent then if you plug 1 into that expression and keep calculating terms you’ll end up with an increasingly accurate estimate of 1/4 pi. Madhava did this and calculated PI to Eleven digits only to by independently rediscovered in 17th century Europe by Scott James Gregory and German, Gottfried Wilhelm lightness and at this point everything kicked off the new decimal notation and algebraic technique allowed for record calculations of Pi. In 1699, it was calculated to 71 digits by Abraham Sharp, then in 1706 John Machin calculated 100 digits who was again beaten by Thomas Fantet De Lagny in 1719 with 112 digits. They were competing with each other using different infinite series, which converged on PI faster instead of just using the inverse tangent infinite series. They might use a combination of different inverse tangent values or something completely different. The competition then became less about which mathematician had done the most calculations and instead which mathematician had the fastest converging infinite series. Development of increasingly efficient infinite series continued well into the 20th century With the technique kind of coming full circle as the current infinite series of choice was developed by Indian prodigy mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan. Of course, by the 20th century Mechanical computers had been invented making it much easier to calculate pi. You basically just used one until he got bored. In 1949 Americans D. F. Ferguson and John wrench calculated PI to 1120 digits. But they were bringing a knife to a gunfight because that very same year the first calculation of Pi by an electronic computer was done, nearly doubling their record with 2037 digits .From here the history of Pi is basically a list of increasingly powerful computers running for a long time and spitting out Increasingly absurd numbers of digits at the time of recording, the world record for digits of Pi calculated is held by Peter Trueb with a shade under 22,459,157,718,361 digits calculated. The question, of course is if we know that pi is going to keep going on forever? It's a transcendental number, why should anybody bother calculating anymore digits? Well for one thing calculating pi is actually a really good way of making sure that your brand-new shiny computer is working properly. Calculating pi uses up a lot of mental brainpower for the computer you have an answer that you can check yours Against and also if you keep going just a little bit longer than the previous person you can have a casual world record. Secondly, pi is actually a really good random number generator If you look at the first two hundred billion digits of pi. You'll find the number zero occurs almost precisely 20 billion times and the same goes for the other digits. That means that if you were to pick a random digit in those 200 billion, there’s an almost exactly 10 percent chance of it being 1, under almost exactly 10% chance being 2 and so on. This makes calculating PI to a large number of digits very valuable to people that want to generate random numbers, people working in cryptography, for example but lastly and arguably most importantly people keep calculating more digits of pi for the same reason that why people memorize tens of thousands of digits of pi and the same reason why people climb mountains and swim oceans and invent the double lug because they can! Humans are weird. We like to understand the world around us and as our civilization has developed We’ve built increasingly complex tools to help us understand the world. It wasn't essential for our survival that we did that we just did it because of the way we're wired because we could pie is a thread that's gone through all of human history because it's a microcosm of how we interact with the natural world from the ancients to present day through Revolutions in Thor and across the world as long as there are people. There's always going to be somebody who just wanders what's the next digit long may that continue?





 BY: AYAN PATHAN www.ayansblogsop.blogspot.com THE STANDARD MODEL

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Dogma of 'Real Me'.

“Its 12:26 am, the lights are mostly out, night has acquired its jazz mood. Its late October, winter is knocking hard, chills blow the curtains as I sit under this shady, not-so-bright light on my desk putting my overcoat on the back of my chair as I am in a restaurant. Too cold, too vintage depicting the very mood of my life right now just right with right number of classics and right amount of wine. A lot of rights there hiding the very wrong in them. I doubt my life is going to be the same merry as before. Though with full optimism in heart I hope for the obverse. I feel like a Human female witnessing my own menstrual cycle, i.e., I feel like a teen girl on periods though I might have no idea what that actually feels like. I wanted it to go like that, little scientific with a blend of cool and all modernized-ish. With no one to talk and a lot to absorb, I sit down in anguish and little conviction to write. As writing has been a great escape and my little way process it ...

A conversation with moon. From Ayan's Journel.

-Well, an encounter from my diary. The last part, I reckon, tends to be more philosophical and thoughtful.  -"It's just another normal day in a normal boy's life. He is trying to get things done. Complete his work in the ordinary manner. But soon enough he lost in thoughts and makes it to an 'extra-ordinary' realm of thoughts and emotions. How it contrasts from reality to imagination . The question remains, what's the difference?  Rest is for you to find out."  Hey! Luna. I know, I am sorry. Couldn't come yesterday. I haven't been my best self lately. My productivity has drastically decreased. I happen to feel a bit sleppy many times in the day. I think I will have to make a new schedule for me and work more on improving my focus and productivity. - I was watching The Good Omens, which I am probably not gonna continue watching. It was good though. The concept of God and biblical beings have been really interesting. I reckon the writers ...

IMAGINING MY DEATH

  IMAGINING MY DEATH Isn’t it fascinating to think about death? Couldn’t it be a great escape to just die? All of us would have thought about killing ourselves but most of us don’t have the courage to do so, but it should not be too difficult to think and imagine one’s death. Let’s imagine together what my death will be like and its consequences as well. I will try to be raw and honest. It might be pretty intense.       If I attempt suicide, I guess I will probably hang myself. Cutting and bleeding to death is more gross and painful. First, Mom will probably enter my room to find my body. This could send her in shock. She will definitely scream. My sister will join next, confused, doesn’t understand what is happening watching mom crying and me, well dead. Dad will come after that, asking, “what happened?” and when he will see me, he will also shout. Mom will be wondering what happened, being in denial. She will probably ask dad to see what happe...